The graph on the bottom will show the low value today (as it shows the daily lowest value) but from tomorrow, it should also increase back. Which (if I'm correct) should display 100% health. So if you have some time, please check this version: Not (only) by the mentioned attribute, but also an other (230 Media Wearout Indicator) which resulted the low health.Īn updated version completed, which should recognise and display such situation properly and display the expected 100% health of course. Thanks for increasing attention to this situation.ĭouble examined all recent reports about WD SSDs and got some new models for testing and researching and yes, it seems these provide the status information slightly differently than the software expected (based on the previous models tested).
Attachments HD Sentinel Status 200219a.jpg (275.65 KiB) Viewed 7275 times smyleseh Posts: 1 Joined: 2019.02.20. Considering the amount of time I've spent reloading OS and apps, I don't want to continue if HDS is accurate, but I am wondering if there's a bug or something being misreported.Īll other drives (mechanical) are working fine, the Kingston is still at 88% and yes, I've confirmed drivers and tried different SATA ports and both IDE and AHCI settings in BIOS.Īny advice will be appreciated. The drive is performing well, other diags and tests report it's in perfect health. The error shown is #232 Available Reserved Space.
Cut my losses and replaced with a WD 250GB Blue, no issues with same install and setup, but now shows health at 1%. plus setup, then health dropped to 9% within 24 hours. First tried an L5 250GB, worked long enough to install Windows 10, Adobe Suite, O365, etc.
Using HD Sentinel for a while now, 256GB Kingston SSD health declining down to 88% and showing about 90 days left so I decided to replace it. Brand new SSDs from two manufacturers are showing up as failing health almost upon installation, yet other diags (WD utils, Crystal Disk Mark, etc.) say everything is fine.
0 kommentar(er)
